welcome! jeremy freese is a professor in sociology at northwestern university. he finds blogging to be a good diversion from insomnia and a far better use of time than television.
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
am i the only one who isn't following the michael jackson trial closely enough to speculate about his guilt or innocence...
...but who is following it just enough to feel hypervalidated in all previous impressions that he has become really, super creepy?
I think he qualifies as scariest person alive. Of course, if you subscribe to the "Onion" theory, he was replaced soon after Thriller by an alien clone gone terribly wrong...
Am I the only one who is increasingly convinced that he is not guilty of the act of which he's accused, but sees the presentations that lead to the (arguabl accurate) sense that he's "creepy" as an attempt to tar him enough that the jury wants to convict him?
6 comments:
Nope, you're not the only one.
I occasionally see the one-liner headlines but I don't go any further with it. I think if he truly has an artificial nose, then he is guilty.
I think he qualifies as scariest person alive. Of course, if you subscribe to the "Onion" theory, he was replaced soon after Thriller by an alien clone gone terribly wrong...
It would explain a lot, actually...
my thoughts exactly.
Am I the only one who is increasingly convinced that he is not guilty of the act of which he's accused, but sees the presentations that lead to the (arguabl accurate) sense that he's "creepy" as an attempt to tar him enough that the jury wants to convict him?
Post a Comment