Floyd Mayweather Sr., who has trained [boxer] Oscar De La Hoya since late 2000, said it doesn't appear he'll work for De La Hoya -- and against his son -- in the May 5 super welterweight title bout [between De La Hoya and Floyd Mayweather, Jr.] [...]Isn't there some pseudo-apocryphal story about George Bernard Shaw sitting next to a man in a bar and saying, "If I paid you a million pounds, would you help me beat the living hell out of your son?" And the man saying quietly, "I guess I would." Then Shaw: "What about for twenty pounds?" Man, indignant: "What kind of father do you think I am?" Shaw: "We've already established that. Now we're just haggling." (For those unfamiliar with the reference, the merely apocryphal version of this story is here).
"If they want me to work against my son, then they're going to have to pay me," Mayweather Sr. told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "My son and I, no matter what's gone down between us, he's still my blood. Hey, I'd work for Oscar if the deal is right, because that's my job and boxing is just a sport.
"But if you want me to tell you how to beat my son -- and I'm the only one who can tell Oscar how to do that -- then you need to pay me."
Monday, January 22, 2007
blood: thicker than water, thinner than a big wad of benjamins
From ESPN.com:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I always thought the Shaw story had to do with him sitting next to a beautiful woman in a bar and saying, "If I paid you a million pounds, would you sleep with me?" She replied, "I guess so." Then Shaw: "What about for 20 pounds?" Woman, indignant: "What kind of woman do you think I am?" Shaw: "We've already established that. Now we're just haggling."
Yes, that is the merely apocryphal version I linked to. I meant to be drawing an analogy between the Mayweather story and the merely apocryphal Shaw story.
Familiar with the reference, but you've got the wrong raconteur. It was Winston Churchill, not Bernard Shaw. Churchill was a bit more nasty with his wit with women than Shaw, in general.
(see the updated correction on that link you provided too)
I could see WC Field doing Churchill, the drinker's nose and all...
I've heard the story both with Shaw and Churchill, but assumed it was apocryphal either way. Is this not so?
Post a Comment