tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5558726.post4220711886263837264..comments2024-02-20T17:40:21.618-05:00Comments on jeremy freese's weblog: because the last thing apple wants is sales of a $600 product taking away sales from a $300 productjeremyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12755662766163119607noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5558726.post-26206059702317632202007-07-12T09:12:00.000-04:002007-07-12T09:12:00.000-04:00Tom, I covered that one on your blog.It's a no-bra...Tom, I covered that one <A HREF="http://atbozzo.blogspot.com/2007/07/indoor-toilets-are-miraculous-but-you.html" REL="nofollow">on your blog</A>.<BR/><BR/>It's a no-brainer, to be sure, but it requires a carrier that can support it.Ken Houghtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01440837287933536370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5558726.post-39036012092311166932007-07-11T15:37:00.000-04:002007-07-11T15:37:00.000-04:00You beat me to that one -- it had me wondering exa...You beat me to that one -- it had me wondering exactly what the job requirements were for 'technology analyst.'<BR/><BR/>BTW, yesterday's action led to a story today in which the iPhone Nano rumor was <A HREF="http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/07/11/low.cost.iphone.confusion/" REL="nofollow">disavowed</A>.<BR/><BR/>An interesting side note is that another <A HREF="http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/07/09/mac.os.x.ipods.by.january/" REL="nofollow">Apple analyst speculation</A> assumes that the 6th-gen iPod will be OS X-based but crippled by lack of Wi-Fi functionality. This makes me intensely curious as to the contents of the agreement between Apple and AT&T, since absent a contractual limitation against such a product, a hard drive Wi-Fi iPhone minus the phone seems like a no-brainer to me (at least inasmuch as it's the product I want until high-capacity flash drives are more affordable).Tom Bozzohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05853926747746938925noreply@blogger.com